Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:21

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What kind of person makes you think "how come there are people like that"?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
New model helps to figure out which distant planets may host life - Phys.org
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
If or when Taylor Swift publicly supports Harris & Walz, what will Republicans do?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
UN calls for investigation into killings near Gaza aid site - BBC
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
PGA Tour Announces Unfortunate News About Multiple Golfers During US Open - Athlon Sports